Bombay High Court
ANIL BIHARILAL JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was held to be infructuous and therefore disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Anil Biharilal Joshi, filed a contempt petition (No. 228 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, argued that due to the passage of time, the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable in light of the elapsed time. Finding that the petition could no longer be pursued, the Court held it to be infructuous. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without further hearing.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the passage of time on the maintainability of a contempt petition?
Subjects
- contempt
- infructuous
- petition disposal
- procedural lapse
- court jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38941
1 908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 228 OF 2013
IN WP/2583/2013
ANIL BIHARILAL JOSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…..
Adv. P. H. Patil h/f Adv. S. U. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner
Adv. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondents-State
…..
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27/08/2026
Per Court:
. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,
submits that by the passage of time, this petition has become
infructuous.
2. In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…