Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS DATTATRAYA KASAR (DECEASED) THR. LRS. MADHURI VILAS KASARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The court dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, the legal representative of the deceased Vilas Dattatraya Kasar, filed a contempt petition before the High Court of Bombay. Subsequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The sole issue before the court was whether the contempt petition could be withdrawn at the petitioner's request. The court examined the procedural rule that a contempt petition may be withdrawn if the petitioner consents and no prejudice is caused to the respondents. Finding no impediment, the court allowed the withdrawal. Accordingly, the contempt petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner upon request

Subjects

  • contempt
  • withdrawal
  • high court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • procedure

Judgment

  2026:BHC-AS:34556


                      Diksha Rane                                                   22 CP 257 2023.docx



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO.257 OF 2023
                      VILAS DATTATRAYA KASAR
                      (DECEASED) THR. LRS. MADHURI
                      VILAS KASAR                                                ..PETITIONER
                                VS
                      UNION OF INDIA AND ORS                                     ..RESPONDENTS



                           Adv. Shankar P. Thorat for petitioner.

                           Adv. Aashish Shasheendran h/f. Adv. Amarendra Mishra (Sr.
                           Panel Counsel, UOI) for respondent – UOI.



                                                           CORAM       : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

                                                           DATE        : 19th AUGUST, 2026.

                      Per Court :
                      1.              Learned    counsel   appearing       for   the    petitioner,       on
                      instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the contempt petition.

                      2.              The contempt petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                       [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]




                                                            Page 1 of 1
                                                       19th AUGUST, 2026


Signed by: Diksha Rane
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 21/08/2026 15:55:06


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.