Bombay High Court

ASHIRWAD RAMRAO GADEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as the respondent has complied with the contempt order.

Summary

Ashirwad, the petitioner, filed a contempt petition (No. 267 of 2010) against the State of Maharashtra and others, seeking enforcement of a prior contempt order. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Yashraj H. Gaherwar, submitted that the respondent had complied with the contempt order. The court, after considering the submission, found that the compliance was satisfactory. Consequently, the court held that there was no further ground to continue the contempt proceeding. The petition was therefore disposed of, with the court noting the compliance and ordering no further action.

Issues considered

Whether the respondent has complied with the contempt order and the petition should be disposed.

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposal
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43499

                                                         909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 267 OF 2010




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 267 OF 2010
                                      IN WP/7511/2008

                                        Ashirwad S/o. Ramrao Gade
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. Yashraj H. Gaherwar h/f. Adv. V. D. Gunale for
                          the Petitioner
                       • Mr. A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for State
                       • Adv. Gaddime Arvind N. for Respondent No. 5 -
                          Absent
                     __________________________________________________________


                                       CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE      : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1)             Learned advocate Mr. Gaherwar holding for

                     Mr. Gunale, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                     the order under contempt is complied with.

                     2)             In view of the same, contempt petition stands

                     disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                           JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                               Page| 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…