Bombay High Court
MR RAOSAHEB BHAUSAHEB PATILversusBRIG RETIRED ABHAY BHAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Since the arrears have been paid and the order complied with, the alleged breach does not amount to contempt.
Summary
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that a previous order had been breached, but they later submitted that the arrears due under that order had been paid and the breach remedied. The court examined whether the compliance with the order negated the alleged contempt. Finding that the petitioners had satisfied the obligations, the court held that there was no contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged breach of the earlier order constitutes contempt of court
Subjects
- contempt
- civil procedure
- arrears
- order compliance
Judgment
35. CP 273-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.273 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2092 OF 2001
Raosaheb Bhausaheb Patil And Ors. … Petitioners
Versus
Brig. (Retired) Abhay Bhat And Ors. … Respondents
…..
Mr. Prathamesh Deshpande i/b Vaibhav Kulkarni for the Petitioners.
Smt. V.R. Raje, A.G.P. for Respondent-State.
…..
CORAM: M.S. KARNIK &
SANDESH wpD. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 1st OCTOBER 2026
P.C.
1. The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the
arrears have been paid. The Order, which was alleged to be
breached has now been complied with.wp
2. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M.S. KARNIK, J.)
RaJesh Chittewan, PS 1/1
Digitally signed by
RAJESH RAJESH VASANT
VASANT CHITTEWAN
CHITTEWAN Date: 2026.10.03
13:20:55 +0530
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.