Bombay High Court
SHAIKH ZAFAR SHAIKH AFSARversusRAJE N LONDHE AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition stands disposed as there is nothing surviving after the writ petition's disposal.
Summary
The Court considered a contempt petition filed by Shaikh Zafar Shaikh Afsar against respondents Raje N. Londhe and others. The petition arose from an interim contempt order that had been issued earlier. Subsequently, the original writ petition (WP/845/2011) was disposed of by an order dated 29 November 2011. The Court held that with the disposal of the writ petition, the interim contempt order no longer had any operative effect. Consequently, there was nothing left to adjudicate in the contempt petition, and the petition was dismissed as disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition survives after the disposal of the underlying writ petition.
Subjects
- contempt
- interim order
- writ petition
- disposal
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42131
1 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 281 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 281 OF 2012
IN WP/845/2011
SHAIKH ZAFAR SHAIKH AFSAR
VERSUS
RAJE N. LONDHE AND ANR
...
Adv. Pathan Hamzakhan I., Advocate for the Petitioner
Adv. S. J Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 09/09/2026
ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :-
. The order under contempt was an interim order and
subsequently by an order dated 29.11.2011 the writ petition itself
is disposed of.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition
and the petition stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…