Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH ZAFAR SHAIKH AFSARversusRAJE N LONDHE AND ANR

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition stands disposed as there is nothing surviving after the writ petition's disposal.

Summary

The Court considered a contempt petition filed by Shaikh Zafar Shaikh Afsar against respondents Raje N. Londhe and others. The petition arose from an interim contempt order that had been issued earlier. Subsequently, the original writ petition (WP/845/2011) was disposed of by an order dated 29 November 2011. The Court held that with the disposal of the writ petition, the interim contempt order no longer had any operative effect. Consequently, there was nothing left to adjudicate in the contempt petition, and the petition was dismissed as disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition survives after the disposal of the underlying writ petition.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • interim order
  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42131


                                            1                  906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 281 OF 2012



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 281 OF 2012
                                     IN WP/845/2011

                               SHAIKH ZAFAR SHAIKH AFSAR
                                          VERSUS
                                RAJE N. LONDHE AND ANR
                                             ...
            Adv. Pathan Hamzakhan I., Advocate for the Petitioner
            Adv. S. J Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State
                                             ...

                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 09/09/2026
            ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :-

            .          The order under contempt was an interim order and

            subsequently by an order dated 29.11.2011 the writ petition itself

            is disposed of.



            2.         In view of the same, nothing survives in the contempt petition

            and the petition stands disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.