Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VINAYAK SADASHIV JADHAVversusHIRALAL JADHAV

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

All the listed petitions are disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, represented by Mr. R.A. Jaiswal, sought to withdraw a series of contempt petitions (Nos. 415 of 2018, 89 of 2019, 284 of 2020, 285 of 2020) and criminal writ petitions (Nos. 423 of 2019 and 1385 of 2023) pending before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The court noted the petitioner's request and, without addressing any substantive merits, ordered that all the listed petitions be disposed of as withdrawn. No factual or legal issues were examined, and no substantive reasoning was required beyond the procedural step of withdrawal. Consequently, the petitions were closed without any further orders. The judgment reflects a procedural disposition rather than a substantive adjudication.

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • contempt petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • procedural disposal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37455-DB

                                                                        415.18CP+

                                              1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                        914 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 415 OF 2018

                  VIJAYKUMAR SHRIRANG JADHAV (C-31) OPEN PRISON,
                                         VISAPUR
                                          VERSUS
                  RAJARAM MANE, DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NASHIK
                                      AND ANOTHER
                                              ...
                        Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
                       AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
                                              …

                        915 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 89 OF 2019

                   HARIDAS YEDOBA JADHAV (C-5610) CENTRAL PRISON,
                                       AURANGABAD
                                          VERSUS
                   ANUP KUMARE, SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON,
                              AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
                                              ...
                        Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
                      AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.Rajdeep D. Raut
                                              ...
                       916 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 284 OF 2020

                                VINAYAK SADASHIV JADHAV
                                           VERSUS
                                      HIRALAL JADHAV
                                               ...
                         Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
                          AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
                                               ...
                        917 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2020

                                SARDAR SHAHWALI KHAN
                                           VERSUS
                             SHRIKANT SINGH AND OTHERS
                                               ...
                         Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
                         AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare
                                                           415.18CP+

                                2

                          ...
      918 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 423 OF 2019

            RAMESH S/O. ZAGADU PATIL (C-05)
                            VERSUS
          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
                                ...
          Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
           APP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil
                                ...
      919 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1385 OF 2023

            VITTHALSING NARAYANSINGH THAKUR
                             VERSUS
         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                 ...
           Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.R.A.Jaiswal
           APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.U.S.Bhosale
                                 …
                      CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                     VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                     DATE      :    18.08.2026
P.C. :


1]           The   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner,   on

instructions, seeks withdrawal of all these Petitions.

2]           In view of the same, all these Petitions are

disposed of as withdrawn.




[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]              [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
        JUDGE                             JUDGE

DDC


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.