Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRABHAKAR DHONDOPANT CHOUDHARYversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner had complied with the contempt order and consequently disposed of the contempt petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Prabhakar Dhondopant Choudhary, filed Contempt Petition No. 285 of 2014 arising out of Writ Petition No. 8725 of 2012 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition alleged that a contempt order had been passed against the respondent and sought appropriate relief. The respondent filed a response and the matter was listed before a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. Counsel for the petitioner appeared and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner had complied with the contempt order. Accepting this submission, the Court found no further ground to entertain the petition. Consequently, the Court ordered that the contempt petition stand disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner has complied with the contempt order and therefore the contempt petition should be dismissed

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • high court

Judgment

                                     (1)
                                                         905 CP-285.2014.odt
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

         905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 285 OF 2014
                   IN WP/8725/2012

            PRABHAKAR DHONDOPANT CHOUDHARY
                                 VERSUS
         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Ms. Rekha Choudhari, Advocate holding for Mr. S.S.
               Choudhari, Advocate for the petitioner.
          Mr. S.J. Salgare, A.G.P. for respondent – State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED       : 1st October, 2026

Per Court :

.     Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

submits that the order under contempt is complied with. In

view of the same, contempt petition stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                    (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                       JUDGE




VD_Dhirde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.