Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Prabhakar so Sheshrao KharadversusSHRI BHARAT SINGADE The Chief Engineer and Administr Labhshetra Vikas Pradhikaran

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The alleged contempt was deemed purged, and the petition was disposed.

Summary

The petitioner filed a contempt petition arising from a prior order dated 7 October 2025. During the pendency of the petition, Respondent No.3 complied with that order, and the petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the compliance. The court accepted the statement that the order had been satisfied. Consequently, the court held that the alleged contempt was purged. The petition was therefore disposed of without further proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether the alleged contempt still subsists after the respondent’s compliance with the earlier court order

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance with order
  • petition disposal
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:31046
                                                                                21.CP.294.2026.odt



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 294 OF 2026
                                               IN
                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 2623 OF 2020

          Prabhakar So Sheshrao Kharad                                   ...Petitioner

                   Versus

          Shri Bharat Singade, The Chief Engineer And
          Administr Labhshetra Vikas Pradhikaran and Others  ...Respondents
                                             ***
          Mr. Umesh P. Darak h/f Mr. Badribishan A. Darak, Advocate for the
          Petitioner.
          Ms. Kalpana Kulkarni h/f Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, Advocate for Respondent
          Nos.1 to 3.
          Mr. R. D. Raut, AGP for Respondent – State.
                                             ***
                                           CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                           DATE : JULY 27, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.                The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that during the

          pendency of this Petition, Respondent No.3 has complied with the order

          dated 07th October 2025 passed by this Court and he is satisfied with the

          same. As such, he urged that the Petition be disposed of. The statement made

          by the learned counsel for the Petitioner is accepted.


          2.                In view of the above statement, the Petition is disposed of as the

          contempt stands purged.


                                                               (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)


          Shrikant Malani                                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.