Bombay High Court

GORAKH ANNASAHEB RAKHversusSHRI NITIN GADRE THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the contempt orders were complied with, the Court disposed of the contempt petitions.

Summary

The petitioners filed two contempt petitions before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioners, represented by Mr. Shubham R. Swami and Mr. Mathpati S.K., claimed that the respondents had not complied with the contempt orders. The respondents, through their respective advocates, submitted that the contempt orders had been complied with. The Court examined the compliance submissions and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court disposed of both contempt petitions, noting that the orders were fulfilled.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt orders issued in the respective cases have been complied with by the respondents

Subjects

contempt
compliance
disposal
High Court
Aurangabad

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:45803-DB

                                                                        443.2024CP+

                                                1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                        936 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2024
                                      IN WP/835/2024
                                DILIP KONDAPPA KINALKAR
                                          VERSUS
                                   SMT. MINAL KARNWAL
                                              ...
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham R. Swami h/f
                 Mr.Mathpati S.K.
                 AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar
                                            AND
                        952 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 312 OF 2024
                                     IN WP/2566/2021

                                GORAKH ANNASAHEB RAKH
                                          VERSUS
                      SHRI NITIN GADRE THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY
                                              ...
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham R. Swami h/f
                 Mr.Mathpati S.K.
                 AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.J. Salgare
                 Advocate for Respondent no.4 : Mr. Shirsat S.R.
                                              ...
                                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                     DATE    :      30.09.2026
                 P.C. :


                 1.        Learned    counsel       for   the   petitioners,   on
                 instructions, submits that the order under contempt is
                 complied with.
                 2.        In view of the same, the Petitions stand disposed
                 of.


                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]             [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                              JUDGE
                 sga

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…