Bombay High Court
GOPINATH BAJABA UGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the alleged contempt no longer subsisted as the order had been complied with.
Summary
Gopinath Bajaba Ugale filed a contempt petition alleging that the State of Maharashtra failed to comply with a court order. The State, through Advocate General A. S. Shinde, submitted an affidavit-in-reply along with a cheque of Rs.1,69,044 deposited in the petitioner's account on 26‑08‑2013, indicating compliance. The court examined the evidence and found that the order had been satisfied. Consequently, the court held that no contempt remained. The petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged contempt of court persists after the respondent has complied with the order by depositing the cheque
Subjects
- contempt of court
- compliance
- cheque
- disposal
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40115
902 cp 318-13 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CONT. PETITION NO. 318 OF 2013
IN WP/2598/2012
GOPINATH BAJABA UGALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
…
Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date : 01/09/2026
PER COURT :
1. None for the petitioner.
2. Learned AGP submits that, the order alleged to have been
disobeyed in the present contempt petition, has been complied with by
depositing the cheque in the petitioner’s account on 26/08/2013.
Along with the affidavit-in-reply, the deponent has annexed the relevant
document indicating that the petitioner is in receipt of cheque for an
amount of Rs.1,69,044/-.
3. In view of the same, nothing survives in the present contempt
petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
VS Maind/ Page|1
Checking your session…