Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT SECRETARYversusMANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the parties have complied with the contempt orders, the court disposed of all the petitions.

Summary

The Marathwada Sarva Shramik Sanghtana filed a series of continuous petitions (Nos. 317-324 of 2020) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Manukumar Shrivastav and others. The petitioners alleged that orders of contempt had been issued against the respondents. The respondents, through their advocates, submitted that they had complied with the contempt orders. The Court examined the compliance submissions and found them satisfactory. Consequently, the Court disposed of all the petitions, noting that no further relief was warranted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt orders issued earlier have been complied with by the respondents
  • Whether the petitions seeking further relief should be dismissed on account of compliance

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • High Court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                              (1)
                                                     913 to 920.odt
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

              913 CONT. PETITION NO. 317 OF 2020
                       IN WP/9131/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale
                                  ….
                                  AND
               914 CONT. PETITION NO. 318 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9153/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar
                                  ….
                                  AND
               915 CONT. PETITION NO. 319 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9142/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mr. G. A. Kulkarni
                                  ..
                              AND
               916 CONT. PETITION NO. 320 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9207/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                     SECRETARY

                            VERSUS
                                    (2)
                                                              913 to 920.odt


              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. D. Raut
                                  …
                              AND
               917 CONT. PETITION NO. 321 OF 2020

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde
                                  …
                                  AND
               918 CONT. PETITION NO. 322 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9159/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare
                                  ...
                                 AND
               919 CONT. PETITION NO. 323 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9141/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                              SECRETARY
                                VERSUS
              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                    …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil
                                  ...
                                AND
               920 CONT. PETITION NO. 324 OF 2020
                           IN WP/9140/2019

MARATHWADA SARVA SHRAMIK SANGHTANA THROUGH ITS JOINT
                                     (3)
                                                           913 to 920.odt
                              SECRETARY
                                                          ….Petitioner
                                VERSUS

              MANUKUMAR SHRIVASTAV AND OTHERS
                                                        …..Respondent
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Hire h/f Mr. P. V. Barde
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale
                                  ...

                   CORAM :      SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                                VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                   DATED :       August 21, 2026

ORDER:-

1.     The learned counsel holding for Mr. P. V. Barde, Advocate for the

petitioners in all these petitions, on instructions, submits that, the

orders under contempt are complied with. In view of the same, all

these petition stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)               (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                   JUDGE

YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.