Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Abdul Hakim Abdul Majid MadooversusState of Maharashtra

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the order dated 21 April 2025 had been complied with, so no contempt was established.

Summary

Shri Abdul Hakim Abdul Majid Madoo filed a contempt petition challenging the State of Maharashtra for alleged non‑compliance of an order dated 21 April 2025. The State, through the Advocate General, submitted a communication from the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate of Bhiwandi along with mutation entries, asserting that the order had been fully complied with. The High Court examined these submissions and the accompanying documents. Finding the evidence satisfactory, the Court concluded that the order was indeed complied with. Consequently, the Court held that there was no basis for finding contempt. The contempt petition was therefore dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is in contempt for alleged non‑compliance of the order dated 21 April 2025

Subjects

  • contempt
  • order compliance
  • writ petition
  • High Court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

Gitalaxmi                                              25-CP-319-2026.docx



            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 319 OF 2026
                                IN
                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3867 OF 2019

SHRI. ABDUL HAKIM ABDUL MAJID MADOO                  ...PETITIONER

                        Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS                  ...RESPONDENTS

     Mr. Manish Kelkar a/w Mr. Anis Momin & Ms. Gauri Phadake,
     Advocates for the Petitioner.

     Ms. Amisha Amin, Advocate for Respondent No. 7.

     Mr. Bhadang, AGP for the State-Respondent.

                                  CORAM      : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

                                  DATE       : 31st AUGUST, 2026.

Per Court :
1.          Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2.          Learned AGP submits that the order dated 21st April, 2025
passed by this Court has been complied with.           Learned AGP has
placed on record a communication dated 14th August, 2026 by the
learned Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Bhiwandi to the
Government Advocate, indicating that the said order is complied
                                      Page 1 of 2
                                 31st AUGUST, 2026
Gitalaxmi                                               25-CP-319-2026.docx



with. Learned AGP has also placed on record a Gav Namuna No. 6
along with various mutation entries. The same are taken on record.

3.          Considering the submissions made by the learned AGP,
Contempt Petition No. 319 of 2026 is disposed of.




                                               [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]

            GITALAXMI
            KRISHNA
            KOTAWADEKAR
            Digitally signed by
            GITALAXMI KRISHNA
            KOTAWADEKAR
            Date: 2026.09.05
            13:36:29 +0530




                                       Page 2 of 2
                                  31st AUGUST, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.