Bombay High Court

MAHADEV VINAYAK ANAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Mahadev Vinayak Anawane filed a contempt petition (No. 321 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner, through Advocate D.R. Jaybhar, asserted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The respondents, represented by Advocate Uma Bhosale for the State and Advocate Rohit Patwardhan for respondent No.4, were not required to make further submissions. The Court, after hearing, accepted the petitioner's claim of compliance. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt petition without any further order.

Issues considered

Whether the order under contempt has been complied with by the petitioner
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the basis of compliance

Subjects

contempt
compliance
disposal
High Court
petition

Judgment

                                  (1)
                                                      4 CP-321.2012.odt
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD
            4 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 321 OF 2012
                     IN WP/116/2010

                MAHADEV VINAYAK ANAWANE
                         VERSUS
          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                    …
          Mr. D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate holding for Mr. D.A. Bide,
                       Advocate for the petitioner.
             Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
     Mr. Rohit Patwardhan, Advocate holding for Mr. Shirish Sangle,
                      Advocate for respondent No.4.
                              ...
                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.

ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) :

1.      Learned advocate Mr. Jaybhar, holding for learned

advocate Mr. Bide for the petitioner, on instructions, submits

that the order under contempt is complied with.

2.      In view of the same, contempt petition is disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                 (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                    JUDGE




VD_Dhirde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…