Bombay High Court

SANJAY LALSING RATHOD AND OTHERSversusJ.S. SAHARAIYA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that since the order under contempt had been complied with, the contempt petition was disposed of.

Summary

In a contempt petition (No. 322 of 2013) arising out of Writ Petition No. 1540 of 2013, the petitioners, Sanjay Lalsing Rathod and others, sought relief against the respondents, J.S. SahrAIYA and others. The petition alleged that a previous order had been contravened, leading to contempt proceedings. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with. The Court examined the compliance submission and found no further ground to continue the contempt proceedings. Consequently, the Court disposed of the contempt petition, concluding the matter.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on account of compliance with the contempt order

Subjects

contempt
compliance
high court
petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41165

                                                                       322.13CP

                                               1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 322 OF 2013
                            IN WRIT PETITION NO.1540 OF 2013

                             SANJAY LALSING RATHOD & OTHERS
                                              VERSUS
                                    J.S.SAHARAIYA & OTHERS
                                                 ...
                      Advocate for the petitioners : Mr.S.B.Sontakke [Online]
                          AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
                          Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr.A.R.Nikam
                                                 ...
                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                     VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                     DATE     :    04.09.2026


                 PER COURT : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.]


                 1]          Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that

                 the order under contempt is complied with.



                 2]          In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is

                 disposed of.



                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]            [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                           JUDGE


                 DDC

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…