Bombay High Court
AJINATH DAGDU AVHAD AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as the contempt order has been complied with and no further relief is warranted.
Summary
Ajinath Dagdu Avhad and others filed Contempt Petition No. 332 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, arising out of Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10672 of 2010 against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners sought relief on the ground that a prior order of contempt had not been complied with. The petitioners' counsel, Omkar V. Chate, submitted that the contempt order had been fully complied with. The Court examined the submission and found that the compliance was indeed effected. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing left to contend in the contempt petition. The petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the order of contempt has been complied with, rendering the contempt petition moot
Subjects
- contempt of court
- petition dismissed
- compliance
- high court
- civil writ
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41578
904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2012
IN WP/10672/2010
Ajinath Dagdu Avhad And Others
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. Omkar V. Chate h/f. Adv. Chate Vitthal M. for the
Petitioners
• Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1) Learned Advocate Mr. O. V. Chate holding for
Mr. V. M. Chate, learned counsel for the petitioners,
submits that the order under contempt is complied with.
2) In view of the same, nothing survives
in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…