Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHOK MADAN PRAKASHKARversusVIKAS KHARGE AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed of as the contempt order has been complied with.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashok Madan Prakashkar, filed a contempt petition. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, noting compliance, ordered that the petition stand disposed. No further directions were given. The judgment was delivered by Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav on September 29, 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be disposed of after compliance with the contempt order

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • court order

Judgment

                                   (1)
                                                    909- C.P. 332-2019.odt
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  CONT. PETITION NO. 332 OF 2019
                         IN WP/4942/2017

                    ASHOK MADAN PRAKASHKAR
                                VERSUS
                    VIKAS KHARGE AND OTHERS
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. D.M. Pingale
AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. D. Raut
                                  ...

                   CORAM :       SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                   DATED :       SEPTEMBER 29, 2026

ORDER

1.     Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that

the order under contempt is complied with.

2.     In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                  JUDGE

YSK/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.