Bombay High Court

KHEMA APPA KOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as the order has been complied with.

Summary

The petition was a contempt petition filed by Khema Appa Kole against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner sought enforcement of a rental compensation order previously directed by the Court. Respondent No.3 filed an affidavit‑in‑reply stating that the rental compensation claim had been decided in accordance with the Court’s earlier order. The Court examined the affidavit and found that the direction had been complied with. Consequently, the Court held that there was no longer any ground for contempt. The contempt petition was therefore disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the respondent complied with the Court’s order directing rental compensation, thereby negating contempt

Subjects

contempt
order compliance
rental compensation
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43414


                                              1              910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2013



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2013
                                     IN WP/3420/2012

                                    KHEMA APPA KOLE
                                          VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...
            None for the Petitioner
            Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State
                                             ...

                                        CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                        DATED : 22/09/2026
            Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. )

            .          None for the petitioner.


            2.         The respondent No. 3 has filed affidavit-in-reply and it is

            stated in the affidavit-in-reply that the petitioner's claim for rental

            compensation is decided, as directed by this Court in the order

            under contempt.



            3.         In view of compliance of the order, contempt petition is

            disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…