Bombay High Court

GANESHSINGH PRAKASHSINGH THAKUR (RAGHUWANSHI) AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that, due to the passage of time, the order must be deemed complied with and therefore dismissed the petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Ganeshsingh Prakashsingh Thakur (Raghuwanshi) and another, filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra alleging that a specific order had not been complied with. The petition argued that the order was being disobeyed by the respondents. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that, given the passage of time, the order must have been complied with. The Court considered whether the alleged non‑compliance could still be established after the lapse of time. Finding that the order was likely complied with, the Court disposed of the petition without further relief.

Issues considered

Whether the order alleged to have been disobeyed has been complied with despite the lapse of time

Subjects

writ petition
order compliance
petition disposal
passage of time

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40123

                                                                           904 cp 342-13 .




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 904 CONT. PETITION NO. 342 OF 2013
                                          IN WP/2817/2010

          GANESHSINGH PRAKASHSINGH THAKUR (RAGHUWANSHI) AND ANR
                                          VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
                                             ...
          Mr. Bedre Vinayak Sudhakar, Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State
                                            ….

                                        CORAM     :   SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                      VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                        Date      :   01/09/2026

          PER COURT :


               Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with the passage
          of time, the order alleged to have been disobeyed, must have been
          complied with.
          2.   In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of.




          [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]                        [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
                       JUDGE                                   JUDGE




                     VS Maind/                                         Page|1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…