Bombay High Court

NANDA MURLIDHAR DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Nanda Murlidhar Deshmukh, filed Contempt Petition No. 348 of 2020 in WP/1431/2019 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The matter was heard before a bench of Justice Sandipkumar C. More and Justice Vaishali Patil‑Jadhav at the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the purpose of filing the petition had been subserved. The court found no further ground to continue the proceedings. Accordingly, the contempt petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed

Subjects

contempt
petition
disposal
High Court
Aurangabad

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38019-DB

                                                                                          901



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          901 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 348 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/1431/2019

                                      Nanda Murlidhar Deshmukh
                                                VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. S. V. Jadhav for the Petitioner
                   Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.GP for State
                   __________________________________________________________


                                         CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                     VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                         DATE      : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)        Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

                   submits        that   the    purpose   of   filing   this   petition    is

                   subserved.

                   2)        Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                                JUDGE




                   Komal Kamble                                                 Page|1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…