Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAM BHANUDAS MAGARversusNARAYAN SANTRAM BANSODE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed as there is no longer any contempt.

Summary

Ram Bhanudas Magar filed a contempt petition against Narayan Santram Bansode after a prior order directed the Head Master to forward the petitioner's proposal, including his pay scale, to the appropriate authorities. The respondent filed an affidavit stating that the proposal had been forwarded to the Education Officer of the Zilla Parishad and that arrears from December 2006 to October 2012 had been paid in compliance with the order. The court examined the affidavit and found that the respondent had complied with the earlier contempt order. Consequently, the court held that no grounds for contempt remained. The petition was therefore disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondent's compliance with the earlier contempt order extinguishes the contempt petition.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • petition
  • compliance
  • pay scale
  • arrears
  • Education Officer
  • Zilla Parishad
  • High Court
  • disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42135


                                             1                  908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2012



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2012
                                     IN WP/2757/2012

                                       RAM BHANUDAS MAGAR
                                                VERSUS
                                   NARAYAN SANTRAM BANSODE
                                                   ...
                           Adv. Shital S. Karle, Advocate for the respondent
                                                   ...
                                        CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                    VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 09/09/2026
            ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :-

            .          In the order under contempt, it was directed to the Head
            Master to forward the proposal of the petitioner including its pay
            scale.
            2.         The sole respondent has filed affidavit-in-reply wherein he has
            stated that the proposal was forwarded to the Education Officer ,
            Zilla Parishad and accordingly the proposal is decided and the
            arrears from December, 2006 up to October, 2012 are also paid in
            compliance of the order.


            3.         In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt
            petition and the petition stands disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.