Bombay High Court
AJEET BHAUSAHEB JAGDHANE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed as there is nothing left to adjudicate.
Summary
A contempt petition (No. 352 of 2020) was filed by Ajeet Bhausaheb Jagdhane against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner did not appear before the court. The court was directed to decide the petitioner's representation, but a communication dated 28‑09‑2020 from the Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare, Beed indicated that the representation issue had already been resolved. Consequently, the court found that there was no remaining matter to adjudicate. The petition was therefore disposed of without any order on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition should proceed when the petitioner's representation has already been decided
Subjects
- contempt
- representation
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38970-DB
903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2020
IN WP/1270/2019
Ajeet Bhausaheb Jagdhane
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
__________________________________________________________
Adv. Sudhir K. Chavan for the Petitioner - Absent
Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026
PER COURT :
1) None appears for the petitioners.
2) The direction is to decide the representation of the
petitioner.
3) However, as per the communication dated 28.09.2020
issued to the petitioner by the Assistant Commissioner,
Social Welfare, Beed, it appears that the representation of
the petitioner has been decided.
4) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present
petition. Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page|1 of 1
Checking your session…