Bombay High Court

ANIL EKNATH KOLHE and ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the contempt order had been complied with and therefore dismissed the contempt petition.

Summary

The petitioners, Anil Eknath Kolhe and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 355 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petition alleged non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners, through counsel Akash E. Madne and A. B. Kale, informed the court that the order had been complied with. The court examined the submission and found that the required compliance had indeed been effected. Consequently, the court held that there was no longer any ground for contempt and disposed of the petition.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners have complied with the contempt order.
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on account of compliance.

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposal
high court
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37644-DB

                                                                               906



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/287/2006

                                     Anil Eknath Kolhe And Others
                                                VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Akash E. Madne h/f. Adv. A. B. Kale for the Petitioners
                   Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for State
                   Adv. Yashraj H. Golewar h/f. Adv. V. D. Gunale for
                   Respondent No. 6
                   __________________________________________________________


                                     CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE      : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)        Learned Advocate Mr. A. E. Madne holding for

                   Mr. A. B. Kale, learned counsel for the petitioners, on

                   instructions, submits that the order under contempt has

                   been complied with.

                   2)        Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                           JUDGE




                   Komal Kamble                                         Page|1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…