Bombay High Court
BALAJI VISHWANATH NARWADEversusBALASAHEB GOVINDRAO JADHAV AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to pursue the matter.
Summary
A contempt petition (No. 356 of 2013) was filed in the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, arising out of Writ Petition No. 5451 of 1998. The petitioner failed to circulate the petition or obtain any notice since its filing in 2013. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court held that the lack of prosecution warranted dismissal of the contempt petition. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner does not circulate the petition or obtain notice?
Subjects
- contempt
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- high court
- writ petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41159
356.13CP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2013
IN WRIT PETITION NO.5451 OF 1998
BALAJI VISHWANATH NARWADE
VERSUS
BALASAHEB GOVINDRAO JADHAV & OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 04.09.2026
PER COURT : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.]
1] None for the petitioner.
2] This Contempt Petition is filed in the year 2013,
but since 2013 the petition is not circulated by the petitioner
and notice is also not issued in the Petition. As the petitioner
is not interested in pursuing the matter, the Contempt
Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…