Bombay High Court

SUREKHA PUNDLIK WAGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the order under contempt has been complied with, the petition stands disposed.

Summary

Surekha Pundlik Wagh filed a contempt petition (No. 356 of 2014) arising out of Writ Petition No. 776 of 2012 against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh, submitted that the order passed in the contempt proceedings had been fully complied with by the respondents. The court examined the submission to determine whether any further relief was required. Finding that the compliance was satisfactory, the judges held that there was no ground to continue the petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the order passed in the contempt proceedings has been complied with by the respondents

Subjects

contempt of court
compliance
petition disposal

Judgment

                                     (1)
                                                         906 CP-256.2014.odt
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

         906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2014
                   IN WP/776/2012

                 SUREKHA PUNDLIK WAGH
                        VERSUS
         THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ms. Priyanka Dayma, Advocate holding for Mr. Mahesh
               Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner.
          Mr. N.B. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No.1-State.
     Mr. U.S. Bondar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED       : 1st October, 2026

Per Court :

.     Learned counsel holding for Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh,

learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the order

under contempt is complied with.             In view of the same, the

petition stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                    (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                       JUDGE




VD_Dhirde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…