Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI VISHNU DAGDU JAGTAP AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THE ITS FINANCE SECRETARY MR. DINESH KUMAR JAIN AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petition was disposed of as not pressed, having been withdrawn by the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioners, Vishnu Dagdu Jagtap & Anr., filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra. Through counsel Mr. Umesh Kurund, appearing via video conferencing, they sought leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the entire pensionary benefits due to them had been received. The petitioners argued that the alleged contempt had been purged and they no longer wished to pursue the matter. The Court considered the petitioners' request and found no objection from the respondents. Consequently, the Court ordered that the contempt petition stand disposed as not pressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner upon satisfaction of the underlying claim.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • withdrawal of petition
  • pension benefits
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                    901-CP-363-2018 (C).doc




                                     IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                              CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2018

                        Vishnu Dagdu Jagtap & Anr.                            ..… Petitioners
                              VERSUS
                        State of Maharashtra & Anr.                           ..… Respondents
                                                       ...
                        Mr. Umesh Kurund, (Through VC) Advocate for Petitioners.

                        Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                                           …
                                                        CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                                 ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                                        DATE : 2 SEPTEMBER 2026.
                        P. C. :

                        1.        Mr. Kurund, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner through

                        Video Conferencing, seeks leave to withdraw the Contempt Petition,

                        submitting that the entire amount towards pensionary benefits has been

                        received by the Petitioner. He therefore submits that the contempt has

                        been purged and that the Petitioner is not pressing the Contempt

                        Petition any further.

                        2.        In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel for the

                        Petitioner, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of as not pressed.


           Digitally
           signed by
           TALLE
TALLE      SHUBHAM
SHUBHAM    ASHOKRAO
ASHOKRAO   Date:
           2026.09.03
                                  (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                  (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
           17:28:51
           +0530


                        Shubham                             1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.