Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DNYANESHWAR ABHIMANYU WAKADE AND OTHERSversusSUGAT SHANKAR GAMARE THE GENERAL MANAGER HR MPP AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

A contempt petition is dismissed when the petitioner unconditionally withdraws it.

Summary

The petitioners, Dnyaneshwar Abhimanyu Wakade and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 363 of 2020) against Sugat Shankar Gamare and another respondent in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. On September 8, 2026, the petitioners submitted a written communication seeking the unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and marked it for identification. Consequently, the court disposed of the contempt petition as withdrawn, without further hearing or adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt petition can be dismissed upon the petitioner's unconditional withdrawal.

Subjects

  • contempt
  • petition withdrawal
  • court procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41575-DB

                                                                   call paper cp 363 2020




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2020
                                    IN/WP/6368/2019

                           Dnyaneshwar Abhimanyu Wakade And Others
                                            Versus
                               Sugat Shankar Gamare And Another
                   __________________________________________________________
                     • Adv. Amol B. Chalak for the Petitioners
                     • Adv. S. V. Adwant for Respondent No. 2 - Absent
                   __________________________________________________________

                                     CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE      : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)             Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board.

                   2)             Learned counsel for the petitioner placed on

                   record written communication dated 08.09.2026 issued by

                   the petitioner for unconditional withdrawal of the present

                   petition. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for

                   identification.

                   3)             In view of the above, Contempt Petition stands

                   disposed of as withdrawn.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                           JUDGE



                   Komal Kamble                                           Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.