Bombay High Court
DNYANESHWAR ABHIMANYU WAKADE AND OTHERSversusSUGAT SHANKAR GAMARE THE GENERAL MANAGER HR MPP AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
A contempt petition is dismissed when the petitioner unconditionally withdraws it.
Summary
The petitioners, Dnyaneshwar Abhimanyu Wakade and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 363 of 2020) against Sugat Shankar Gamare and another respondent in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petition was presented before Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. On September 8, 2026, the petitioners submitted a written communication seeking the unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and marked it for identification. Consequently, the court disposed of the contempt petition as withdrawn, without further hearing or adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition can be dismissed upon the petitioner's unconditional withdrawal.
Subjects
- contempt
- petition withdrawal
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41575-DB
call paper cp 363 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2020
IN/WP/6368/2019
Dnyaneshwar Abhimanyu Wakade And Others
Versus
Sugat Shankar Gamare And Another
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. Amol B. Chalak for the Petitioners
• Adv. S. V. Adwant for Respondent No. 2 - Absent
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
PER COURT :
1) Not on board. On mentioning, taken on board.
2) Learned counsel for the petitioner placed on
record written communication dated 08.09.2026 issued by
the petitioner for unconditional withdrawal of the present
petition. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
identification.
3) In view of the above, Contempt Petition stands
disposed of as withdrawn.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…