Bombay High Court

ROHIDAS RANGNATH POLE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Rohidas Rangnath Pole and another filed a contempt petition (No. 365 of 2020) against the State of Maharashtra and others in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench. The petitioners, through Advocate V. A. Patil and counsel S. B. Chaudhari, asserted that the order of contempt had been complied with. The State was represented by Ms. U. S. Bhosale, AGP, while Respondent No. 3 was represented by Adv. Aniket Wadwale on behalf of Adv. Anil M. Gaikwad. The court examined the submission that the contempt order was fulfilled. Finding the submission satisfactory, the judges disposed of the contempt petition. No further directions or penalties were imposed.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt order issued against the petitioners has been complied with for the purpose of disposing the contempt petition

Subjects

contempt
compliance
high court
petition disposal
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37645-DB

                                                                                  908



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 365 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/9958/2019

                                   Rohidas Rangnath Pole And Another
                                                VERSUS
                                  The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. V. A. Patil h/f. Adv. Sushant B. Choudhari for the
                   Petitioners
                   Ms. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for State
                   Adv. Aniket Wadwale h/f. Adv. Anil M. Gaikwad for
                   Respondent No. 3
                   __________________________________________________________


                                     CORAM      : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATE       : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)                Learned Advocate Mr. V. A. Patil holding for

                   Mr. S. B. Chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner, on

                   instructions, submits that the order under contempt has

                   been complied with.

                   2)                Contempt     Petition,   therefore,      stands

                   disposed of.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                            JUDGE



                   Komal Kamble                                            Page|1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…