Bombay High Court

RAJENDRA KANTILAL CHOPDA AND ANOTHERversusVIVEK AGARAWAL AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition was disposed of as Respondent No. 1 had complied with the order, leaving no basis for contempt.

Summary

Petitioners Rajendra Kantilal Chopda and another filed a contempt petition against respondents Vivek Agarawal and another. The petition sought relief on the ground that the respondents had allegedly failed to comply with a prior court order. Counsel for the petitioners submitted that Respondent No. 1 had now complied with the order. The court, after noting the submission, held that there was no longer any ground for contempt. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether Respondent No. 1 complied with the earlier court order, thereby negating the contempt petition

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposed
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37646-DB

                                                                                909



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/1152/2020

                                  Rajendra Kantilal Chopda And Another
                                                VERSUS
                                       Vivek Agarawal And Another

                   __________________________________________________________
                   Adv. Onkar Ajit Gholap for the Petitioners
                   Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.GP for State
                   Adv. A. G. Talhar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 - Absent
                   __________________________________________________________


                                      CORAM    : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                      DATE     : AUGUST 20, 2026

                   PER COURT :

                   1)        Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   Respondent No. 1 has complied with the order under

                   contempt.

                   2)        Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.



                   (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                             JUDGE                           JUDGE




                   Komal Kamble                                          Page|1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…