Bombay High Court

URMILA VAIJNATH KOLLEversusBABRUWAN MANIKRAO JADHAV, CHAIRMAN, SWAMI VIVEKANAND BAHU UDESHIYA VIKAS MANDAL AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the respondents complied with the contempt order, the contempt petition is disposed.

Summary

Petitioner Urmila Vaijnath Kolle filed Contempt Petition No. 374 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, alleging that the respondents, including Babruwan Manikrao Jadhav, Chairman of Swami Vivekanand Bahu Udeshiya Vikas Mandal, were in contempt of a prior order. The petition sought relief for the alleged contempt. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The Court examined the compliance submission. Finding that the respondents had fulfilled the contempt order, the Court disposed of the contempt petition. No further directions were issued.

Subjects

contempt of court
compliance
petition disposed

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42138


                                             1                  911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2012



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                          911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2012
                                     IN WP/3728/2011

                                URMILA VAIJNATH KOLLE
                                          VERSUS
                  BABRUWAN MANIKRAO JADHAV, CHAIRMAN, SWAMI
               VIVEKANAND BAHU UDESHIYA VIKAS MANDAL AND ORS
                                             ...
            Adv. S. B. Pethkar h/f Adv. M. C. Swami, Advocate for the Petitioner
            Adv. K. R. Chaudhari h/f Adv. S. B. Solanke, Advocate for
            Respondent No.2 and 3.
                                             ...

                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 09/09/2026
            ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.) :-

            .          The learned counsel holding for Mr.Swami, on instructions,

            submits that the order under contempt is complied with.


            2.         In view of the same, the contempt petition stands disposed of.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…