Bombay High Court
ARVIND KONDOPANT KANADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court held that the contempt petition may be withdrawn and therefore disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Arvind Kondopant Kanade, filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 374 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was pending before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Siddhesh Deshmukh, applied for permission to withdraw the contempt petition. The respondents were represented by Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, Advocate General. The Bench, comprising Justice Sandipkumar C. More and Justice Vaishali Patil‑Jadhav, considered the application. The Court granted permission to withdraw, holding that a petitioner may withdraw a contempt petition at any stage before a final order. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw a contempt petition pending before the High Court
Subjects
- contempt of court
- withdrawal of petition
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40121
906 cp 374-13 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 CONT. PETITION NO. 374 OF 2013
IN WP/6899/2012
ARVIND KONDOPANT KANADE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Siddhesh Deshmukh h/f Mr. Deshmukh Arvind, Advocate for the
Petitioner
Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondent-State
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date : 01/09/2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
the contempt petition. Permission is granted.
2. As such, the contempt petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
VS Maind/ Page|1
Checking your session…