Bombay High Court

MRS. SEEMA D/O. MANOHARRAO BOKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Mrs. Seema Boke filed a contempt petition alleging that an order directing the Education Officer to grant her approval for services after a management proposal had not been complied with. The respondent filed an affidavit stating that the order was complied with and approval was granted on 06-11-2013. The Court examined the affidavit and found that the order under contempt had indeed been fulfilled. Consequently, the Court held that there was no longer any ground for the contempt petition. The petition was therefore disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the order under contempt directing the Education Officer to grant approval to the petitioner has been complied with

Subjects

contempt of court
order compliance
education officer
petition disposed

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41161

                                                                         389.13CP

                                                1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                          910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 389 OF 2013
                             IN WRIT PETITION NO.4590 OF 2009

                            MRS. SEEMA D/O.MANOHARRAO BOKE
                                               VERSUS
                           THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
                                                  ...
                       Advocate for the petitioner : Ms.Priyanka D.Maske h/f.
                                           Mr.S.B.Talekar
                             AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil
                                                  ...
                                        CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                      VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                      DATE      :   04.09.2026


                 ORDER : [Per : Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J.]


                 1]           By the order under contempt Education Officer
                 was directed to grant approval to the petitioner’s services
                 after the submission of proposal by management.

                 2]           The affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent
                 no.2 wherein in para no.7 it is stated that the order under
                 contempt is complied with and the approval is granted to the
                 petitioner by order dated 06.11.2013.

                 3]           In view of the same, nothing survives in the
                 present Contempt Petition and the same stands disposed of.




                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]             [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                            JUDGE
                 DDC

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…