Bombay High Court

SHANKAR JANYYA PAGOTE AND OTHERSversusDR. SANJAY CHAHANDE AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed as there is no surviving issue after the representations were decided.

Summary

The petitioners, Shankar Jannya Pagote and others, filed a continuous petition (No. 389 of 2020) seeking relief against Dr. Sanjay Chahande and others. The respondents argued that the petitioner's counsel was no longer present and that the petition was limited to deciding the petitioners' representations, which had already been resolved as per a communication dated 14-12-2020. The Court examined the submissions and found that the issue raised by the petitioners had been previously decided. Consequently, the Court held that there was no remaining matter for adjudication. The petition was therefore dismissed as nothing survived in it.

Issues considered

What is the status of the petitioner's representations and whether they have already been decided?

Subjects

petition disposal
representation decision
High Court of Bombay
procedural order
continuous petition

Judgment

                                   (1)
                                                    907- C.P. 389-2020.odt
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  CONT. PETITION NO. 389 OF 2020
                         IN WP/6057/2019

              SHANKAR JANYYA PAGOTE AND OTHERS
                              VERSUS
                DR. SANJAY CHAHANDE AND OTHERS
                                 …..
       AGP for Respondents: Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar
       Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Umesh S. Mote
                                 ...

                   CORAM :       SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                                 VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                   DATED :       August 21, 2026

ORDER:-

1.     Though the learned counsel for respondent No.3 submits that

the counsel for the petitioner is no more, but he further pointed out

that the direction was only to decide the representations of the

petitioners and as per the communication dated 14.12.2020, the

representations of the petitioners is already decided.

2.     As such, nothing survives in this petition, and it stands disposed

of.


(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                  JUDGE

YSK/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…