Bombay High Court

THE PRESIDENT THE INDUSTRIAL ASSO OF SMALL SCALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed as there is no longer any breach of the contempt order.

Summary

The President of the Industrial Association of Small Scale filed Contempt Petition No. 39 of 2008 against the State of Maharashtra and others, alleging non-compliance with a prior contempt order. The petition was heard before a bench of Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav. Counsel for the petitioner, Adv. Deepali Nikalje, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with with the passage of time. The court examined the submission and found that there was no longer any breach to remedy. Consequently, the court held that nothing survived in the contempt petition and ordered it to be disposed. The order was pronounced on 22 September 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on account of compliance with the earlier contempt order

Subjects

contempt
compliance
petition disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43378


                                            1                 902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2008



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                           902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 39 OF 2008
                                     IN WP/1012/2003

               THE PRESIDENT THE INDUSTRIAL ASSO OF SMALL SCALE
                                         VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
                                            ...
            Adv. Deepali Nikalje h/f Adv. A. G. Talhar, Advocate for the
            Petitioner
            Adv. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State
                                            ...

                                       CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATED : 22/09/2026
            Order ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :

            .          The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the

            passage of time, the order under contempt is complied with.



            2.         In view of the same, nothing survives in this contempt

            petition and the same stands disposed of.



            [



            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…