Bombay High Court
KAI PANDURANGRAO PATIL SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, DHAMANGAON THR PRESIDENT AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
No contempt was found as the State complied with the order, leading to the petition's disposal.
Summary
The petitioners, Kai Pandurangrao Patil Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and another, filed a contempt petition (No. 402 of 2013) alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to comply with a prior order. The petitioners' counsel was absent, while the State and other respondents were represented. The court examined whether the alleged disobedience persisted. It found that the State had complied with the petitioners' proposal on 6 December 2013, thereby removing the basis for contempt. Consequently, the court held that no contempt had occurred and ordered the petition disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance with the earlier order amounted to contempt of court
Subjects
- contempt
- order compliance
- high court
- petition disposed
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41584
910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 402 OF 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 402 OF 2013
IN WP/6672/2012
Kai Pandurangrao Patil Shikshan Prasarak Mandal,
Dhamangaon Through President And Another
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. S. R. Choukidar for the Petitioners - Absent
• Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.G.P. for State
• Adv. S. B. Pulkundwar for Respondent No. 2
• Adv. V. S. Panpatte for Respondent No. 3
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1) None for the petitioners.
2) The order of which disobedience is alleged in
this petition is complied with by deciding the proposal of
the petitioners on 06.12.2013 by the State of Government.
3) In view of the same, nothing survives
in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…