Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRADDHA DINESH KADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY,

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petition was dismissed because the respondents had complied with the court's order, eliminating any breach.

Summary

The petitioners, Shraddha Dinesh Kad and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court and subsequently a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, the State of Maharashtra and others, had breached a court order. The court examined whether the alleged breach persisted. Evidence showed that the respondents had complied with the order in question. Consequently, the court found no ongoing contempt. The judges therefore ordered that the contempt proceedings be dropped. The petition was disposed of without any penalty.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents had breached the court's order as alleged in the contempt petition
  • Whether compliance with the order negates the existence of contempt

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance
  • writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

NISHA             Digitally signed by
                  NISHA SANDEEP
SANDEEP           CHITNIS
                  Date: 2026.09.16
CHITNIS           13:57:23 +0530
                                                                               24-cp.403.2026.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CONTEMPT PETITION NO.403 OF 2026
                                                       IN
                                          WRIT PETITION NO.8131 OF 2024

                  Shraddha Dinesh Kad and Ors.                ...Petitioners
                        Versus
                  State of Maharashtra and Ors.               ...Respondents

                  Ms. Jotiram R. Jadhav for the Petitioners.

                  Mr. Karan S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel Counsel with Mr. M. M. Pable, A.G.P.
                  for the Respondent-State.

                                                  CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE &
                                                         ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ.

                                                DATE    : 10th SEPTEMBER 2026
                  P.C. :

                  1.                Since we are informed that there is compliance with the

                  order of which the breach was alleged, we drop the contempt

                  proceedings.



                  ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.                          BHARATI DANGRE, J.




  N. S. Chitnis                                                                              1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.