Bombay High Court

BABURAO LAXMAN KARPE AND OTHERSversusSUNIL S CHAVAN, COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the contempt orders have been complied with, the petitions stand disposed.

Summary

Three continuous petitions (Nos. 910, 911 and 912 of 2020) were filed in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, by various petitioners against Collector Sunil S. Chavan and others. The petitioners sought relief concerning orders of contempt. The petitioners informed the Court that the contempt orders had been complied with. On that basis, the learned counsel submitted that there was no longer any ground to continue the proceedings. The Court accepted the submission and disposed of all three petitions.

Issues considered

Whether the petitions should continue in view of compliance with the contempt orders

Subjects

contempt
petition disposal
high court
compliance

Judgment

                                  (1)
                                                          910 to 912.odt
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               910 CONT. PETITION NO. 406 OF 2020
                       IN CA/10880/2019

                   TULSABAI BABURAO BAJMALI
                                VERSUS
           SUNIL S CHAVAN COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Pratiksha R. Jamdhade h/f
                              Mr. N. R. Jamdhade
AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde
                                   ….
                                 AND

               911 CONT. PETITION NO. 407 OF 2020
                       IN CA/10874/2019

              BABURAO LAXMAN KARPE AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
           SUNIL S CHAVAN, COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Pratiksha R. Jamdhade h/f
                              Mr. N. R. Jamdhade
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare
                                  ..

                               AND
               912 CONT. PETITION NO. 409 OF 2020
                       IN CA/10881/2019

              RADHABAI SANDU RASAL AND OTHERS
                                VERSUS
            SUNIL CHAVAN COLLECTOR AND ANOTHER
                                   …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Adv. Pratiksha R. Jamdhade h/f
                              Mr. N. R. Jamdhade
AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil
                                  ...

                  CORAM :      SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                               VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                  DATED :       August 21, 2026
                                    (2)
                                                             910 to 912.odt
ORDER:-

1.     The learned counsel for the petitioners in all these petitions, on

instructions, submits that, the orders under contempt are complied

with and accordingly all these petition stand disposed of.




(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)              (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                  JUDGE

YSK/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…