Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH SAMEERUDDIN AJEEMODDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is dismissed as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Shaikh Sameeruddin Ajeemoddin filed Contempt Petition No. 415 of 2013 challenging a contempt order issued against him in the earlier proceeding WP/8084/2012. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the Additional Government Pleader, submitted that the petitioner had fully complied with the contempt order. The petitioner, through his counsel, confirmed that the compliance had indeed taken place. The Court examined the submissions and found no remaining issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the Court held that the contempt petition had become moot and ordered its disposal.

Issues considered

  • What is the status of the contempt order with respect to the petitioner's alleged compliance?
  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed on the ground that the order has been complied with?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • High Court
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41585

                                                             911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 415 OF 2013




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 415 OF 2013
                                      IN WP/8084/2012

                                      Shaikh Sameeruddin Ajeemoddin
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. Samta S. Pathare h/f. Adv. Uddhav Momale for
                          the Petitioner
                       • Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for State
                     __________________________________________________________


                                         CORAM       : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                       VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                         DATE        : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026

                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1)             Learned A.G.P. submits that the order under

                     contempt is complied with and the same fact is confirmed

                     by learned counsel for the petitioner.

                     2)             In   view   of    the   same,     nothing        survives

                     in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands

                     disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                                JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                                   Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.