Bombay High Court

DILIP KONDAPPA KINALKARversusSMT. MINAL KARNWAL

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Both contempt petitions were disposed of on the ground that the petitioners had complied with the contempt orders.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two contempt petitions—Petition No. 443 of 2024 (Dilip Kondappa Kinalkar v. Smt. Minal Karnwal) and Petition No. 312 of 2024 (Gorakh Annasaheb Rakh v. Shri Nitin Gadre). The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Shubham R. Swami and Mr. Mathpati S.K., submitted that the orders of contempt had been complied with. The Court examined the compliance submissions and found no further issue to be adjudicated. Consequently, the Court disposed of both petitions, effectively dismissing the contempt proceedings. No substantive legal questions on the merits of contempt were raised, and the disposition was based solely on compliance with the earlier contempt orders.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners have complied with the earlier contempt orders and therefore the contempt petitions should be dismissed

Subjects

contempt of court
compliance
petition disposal
High Court
civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:45802-DB

                                                                        443.2024CP+

                                                1

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                        936 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 443 OF 2024
                                      IN WP/835/2024
                                DILIP KONDAPPA KINALKAR
                                          VERSUS
                                   SMT. MINAL KARNWAL
                                              ...
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham R. Swami h/f
                 Mr.Mathpati S.K.
                 AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. M.N. Ghanekar
                                            AND
                        952 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 312 OF 2024
                                     IN WP/2566/2021

                                GORAKH ANNASAHEB RAKH
                                          VERSUS
                      SHRI NITIN GADRE THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY
                                              ...
                 Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shubham R. Swami h/f
                 Mr.Mathpati S.K.
                 AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.S.J. Salgare
                 Advocate for Respondent no.4 : Mr. Shirsat S.R.
                                              ...
                                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                  VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                     DATE    :      30.09.2026
                 P.C. :


                 1.        Learned    counsel       for   the   petitioners,   on
                 instructions, submits that the order under contempt is
                 complied with.
                 2.        In view of the same, the Petitions stand disposed
                 of.


                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]             [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                              JUDGE
                 sga

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…