Bombay High Court

RAHEJA LEGEND CONDOMINIUMversusRAHEJA UNIVERSAL PRIVATE LIMITED

Decided: 1 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed as there was no contempt after the respondent complied with clause 16.

Summary

The petitioners, Raheja Legend Condominium, filed a contempt petition against Raheja Universal Private Limited alleging breach of clause 16 of the consent terms. The petition alleged that the respondent had failed to comply with the stipulated clause. Both parties, through their counsel, subsequently informed the court that clause 16 had now been complied with. The court examined whether a breach existed that could amount to contempt. Finding that the alleged breach no longer existed, the court held that no contempt action was warranted. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of without any order of punishment.

Issues considered

Whether the alleged violation of clause 16 of the consent terms constitutes contempt of court
Whether the respondent's subsequent compliance negates the basis for contempt proceedings

Subjects

contempt
consent terms
compliance
civil procedure
condominium

Judgment

902.CP-446.26.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed
by PRACHI
PRACHI
PRANESH
PRANESH
NANDIWADEKAR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
NANDIWADEKAR
Date: 2026.09.02
11:51:29 +0530 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 446 OF 2026

Raheja Legend Condominium … Petitioner
V/s.
Raheja Universal Private Limited …. Respondent
______________________

Mr. Priyank Kapadia a/w Mr. Harsh Thadani, Ms. Vriddhi
Pardasany i/by M. Mulla Associates, for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. V. Deokar i/by Parimal K. Shroff & Co. for the Respondent.
______________________

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 1 SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C. :-

1. Heard Mr. Kapadia, learned counsel appearing for the

Petitioner and Mr. Deokar, learned counsel appearing for the

Respondent.

2. This Contempt Petition is filed alleging that clause no.16 of

the consent terms is violated. However, learned counsel appearing

for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the

Respondent state that the said clause no.16 has now complied

with. As clause no.16 of the consent terms is complied with, it is

Page 1
PPN
902.CP-446.26.DOC

not necessary to take any action against the Respondent in this

Contempt Petition.

3. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

Page 2
PPN

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…