Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NEEKITA SURESH AINLAWARversusSANDIP G GOLAID, JOINT COMMISSIONEWR SCHEDULED TRIB CERTIICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE ABAD AND ANR

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the order under contempt has been complied with, leading to the disposal of the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Neekita Suresh Ainlawar, filed a contempt petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The respondent State, represented by AGP Mr. N. B. Patil, argued that the contempt order had been complied with. The Court, after hearing counsel, found that the petitioner had indeed complied with the contempt order. Consequently, the Court held there was no further ground to continue the petition. The petition was therefore disposed of by the Court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order under contempt has been complied with by the petitioner

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44089-DB

                                                                    904 cp 458-19 .




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            904 CONT. PETITION NO. 458 OF 2019
                                     IN WP/1330/2019

                              NEEKITA SURESH AINLAWAR
                                         VERSUS
           SANDIP G GOLAID, JOINT COMMISSIONEWR SCHEDULED TRIB
               CERTIICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE ABAD AND ANR
                                           ...
          Mr. Satyam Kumar h/f Mr. Thorat Chandrakant R., Advocate for the
          Petitioner
          Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State
                                           ….

                                    CORAM      :   SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                    Date       :   24/09/2026

          PER COURT :


               Learned counsel, holding for Mr. Thorat, on instructions
          submits that the order under contempt has been complied with. As
          such, the petition stands disposed of.




          [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]                   [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
                      JUDGE                               JUDGE




                VS Maind/                                        Page|1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.