Bombay High Court
SHIVAJI JAYAJI GADEKAR AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Since the petitioners complied with the contempt order, no contempt remains and the petitions are disposed.
Summary
The petitioners, Trimbak Dayaram Waykole and another, filed contempt petitions (Nos. 462 and 461 of 2012) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel submitted that the order of contempt had been complied with. The Court examined whether any contempt remained pending. Finding that the petitioners had fully complied with the contempt order, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, the contempt petitions were dismissed and the matters were disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt order remains subsisting against the petitioners
- Whether the petitioners have complied with the contempt order
- Whether the contempt petitions should be dismissed
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- petition dismissal
- High Court
- Bombay
- Aurangabad
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41580
905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 462 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 462 OF 2012
IN WP/3223/2012
Trimbak Dayaram Waykole And Another
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. Shinde Shankarrao G. for the Petitioners
• Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
AND/WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 461 OF 2012
IN WP/3322/2012
…
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the order under contempt is complied with.
2) In view of the same, nothing survives
in the present Contempt Petitions and the same stand
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…