Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SOMNATH DAMODHAR SONJE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the petitioners complied with the contempt order, the contempt petition stands disposed.

Summary

The petitioners, Somnath Damodhar Sonje and others, filed a contempt petition (No. 469 of 2012) against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners' counsel submitted that they had complied with the earlier contempt order. The court examined the compliance submission and found no remaining issues to be adjudicated. Consequently, the court held that the contempt petition could not proceed further. The petition was therefore disposed of with no further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed after the petitioners complied with the contempt order

Subjects

  • contempt
  • compliance
  • petition disposed
  • High Court
  • Aurangabad
  • civil procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41581

                                                             906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 469 OF 2012




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 469 OF 2012
                                      IN WP/3195/2012

                                    Somnath Damodhar Sonje And Others
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. Shinde Shankarrao G. for the Petitioners
                       • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State
                     __________________________________________________________

                                         CORAM       : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                       VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                         DATE        : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]


                     1)             Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                     the order under contempt is complied with.

                     2)             In   view   of    the   same,     nothing        survives

                     in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands

                     disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                                JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                                   Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.