Bombay High Court
KOHIRKAR NAGAPPA RANANNAversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed as there is nothing left to entertain after compliance with the contempt order.
Summary
The petitioners filed Contempt Petition No. 471 of 2012 challenging a contempt order. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with. The court examined the submission and found that compliance removed any remaining grievance. Consequently, the court held that there was nothing left to entertain in the petition. The petition was therefore disposed of with no further relief. The order was pronounced by Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil‑Jadhav on 8 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition remains maintainable after compliance with the contempt order
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- petition disposed
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41735
907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 471 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 471 OF 2012
IN WP/3198/2012
Kohirkar Nagappa Rananna
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
• Adv. Shinde Shankarrao G. for the Petitioner
• Ms. U. S. Bhosale, A.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the order under contempt is complied with.
2) In view of the same, nothing survives
in the present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…