Bombay High Court
SATISH BANSI SALVEversusSHRI PATEL, CHAIRMAN, DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE NO. 1, ABAD AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Satish Bansi Salve filed a contempt petition (No. 478 of 2012) against Shri Patel, Chairman of the Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and others. The petitioner was represented by Ms. Sarita Pathare (advocate holding) and Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh. The respondent State was represented by Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. During the proceedings, the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining cause of action. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the contempt petition is infructuous and should be dismissed?
Subjects
- contempt
- infructuous
- petition dismissal
- high court
- civil procedure
Judgment
(1)
6 CP-478.2012.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
6 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 478 OF 2012
IN WP/1580/2012
SATISH BANSI SALVE
VERSUS
SHRI PATEL, CHAIRMAN, DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE
SCRUTINY COMMITTEE NO. 1, ABAD AND OTHERS
…
Ms. Sarita Pathare, Advocate holding for Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh,
Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. G.A. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent-State.
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 7 SEPTEMBER 2026.
ORDER (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J) :
1. Ms. Sarita Pathare, learned advocate holding for Mr.
Mahesh Deshmukh, learned advocate for the petitioner, on
instructions, submits that the petition has become
infructuous.
2. As such, the contempt petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
VD_Dhirde
Checking your session…