Bombay High Court
ANAND SHESHRAO BHAROSE AND ORSversusDR. VEDPRAKASH KASHIRAO PATIL AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition does not survive the disposal of the main writ petition and is therefore disposed.
Summary
The petitioners filed a contempt petition (No. 480 of 2011) arising out of a writ petition (WP/6155/2011). The main writ petition had already been disposed of by the court. The respondents argued that with the disposal of the writ, the contempt petition could no longer survive. The bench examined whether any residual issue remained that could sustain the contempt proceedings. Finding that the disposal of the main writ eliminated the basis for the contempt claim, the court held that nothing survived in the contempt petition. Consequently, the contempt petition was ordered to stand disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition remains viable after the disposal of the main writ petition from which it arose
Subjects
- contempt of court
- writ petition disposal
- jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42537
1 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 480 OF 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 480 OF 2011
IN WP/6155/2011
ANAND SHESHRAO BHAROSE AND ORS
VERSUS
DR. VEDPRAKASH KASHIRAO PATIL AND ANR
...
Adv. H. A. Shinde h/f Adv. V. R. Dhorde, Advocate for the Petitioner
Adv. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondents-State
Adv. D. R, Irale-Patil, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 11/09/2026
ORDER ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :-
. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, nothing
survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…