Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Seema Nitin DhakanversusThe Senior Inspector of Police Investigating Officer

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the petition may be withdrawn on the petitioner's request.

Summary

A contempt petition (No. 488 of 2026) was filed by Seema Nitin Dhakan against Senior Inspector of Police & Anr. The petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, considered the request. It found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the petition was permitted to be withdrawn and the matter was dismissed and disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the contempt petition

Subjects

  • contempt petition
  • withdrawal of petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                               901-CP-488-2026.doc

                             S.S.Kilaje


                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                   CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 488 OF 2026
                                                                   IN
                                                 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3533 OF 2019

                                   Seema Nitin Dhakan                                         ...Petitioner
                                   VERSUS
SONALI SATISH
          Digitally signed
       by SONALI

SATISH Date:
               KILAJE              The Senior Inspector of Police & Anr.                      ...Respondents
KILAJE 2026.09.02
       14:59:19 +0530




                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                   Advocate M.A.Khan a/w. Azeem Abdul i/b. The Law Suits, for Petitioner.
                                   Ms. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM          :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE           :   1st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                   P.C. :

                                   1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP.

                                   2.         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave

                                   to withdraw the Petition.

                                   3.         Considering the submission of learned counsel for the

                                   Petitioner, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.

                                   4.         Dismissed and disposed of.



                                                                                  (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                                                    Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.