Bombay High Court
Srushti Nilesh Bhoinwad Through father and natural guardianversusThe State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition was disposed as nothing survived in it after the tribe claim was rejected.
Summary
The petitioner, Srushti Nilesh Bhoinwad, filed a contempt petition (No. 504 of 2026) arising out of Writ Petition No. 2161 of 2026. The petition sought relief based on a tribe claim. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the State of Maharashtra placed on record an order dated 03.09.2026 wherein the tribe claim was rejected. The Court observed that with the rejection of the tribe claim, the basis of the contempt petition no longer existed. Consequently, the Court held that nothing survived in the petition and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the rejection of the tribe claim on the continuance of the contempt petition?
Subjects
- contempt
- tribe claim
- petition disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41457-DB
504.26CP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
923 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.504 OF 2026
IN WRIT PETITION NO.2161 OF 2026
SRUSHTI NILESH BHOINWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.M.B.Karande
AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 04.09.2026
P.C. :
1] Heard.
2] The learned AGP placed on record the order in
respect of tribe claim of the petitioner dated 03.09.2026
whereby the tribe claim is rejected.
3] In view of the same, nothing survives in this
petition and the same stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…