Bombay High Court

RAVAN MAROTI KEKANversusRAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the contempt order has been complied with, the contempt petitions are infructuous and are disposed of.

Summary

The petitioners filed a series of continuation contempt petitions (Nos. 30, 44, 48, 51, 52, 65, 67, 68, 81 of 2012) against various respondents alleging non‑compliance with a prior contempt order. The petitioners argued that the contempt orders had been complied with, rendering the petitions infructuous. The Court examined whether the petitions remained viable after compliance. It held that since the contempt orders were fully complied with, the petitions could no longer be maintained. Consequently, the Court ordered that all the contempt petitions stand disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether a contempt petition becomes infructuous and must be dismissed when the order under contempt has been complied with

Subjects

contempt
continuation petition
order complied
disposal
High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                                 (1)
                                                         902 to 910.odt
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               902 CONT. PETITION NO. 30 OF 2012
                       IN WP/4045/2011

                  DEVIDAS BANKATRAO SAWANT
                                VERSUS
                    RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS
                                  …..
      Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
      AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde
      Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                  ….
                                 AND

               903 CONT. PETITION NO. 44 OF 2012
                       IN WP/4030/2011

                       BABU RANBA NEHARKAR
                                VERSUS
   RAJGOPAL DEORA SECRETARY CO OPL AND TEXTILES DEPTT
                          MUMBAI AND ORS
                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T.G. Gaikwad
                                 ….
                                 AND

               904 CONT. PETITION NO. 48 OF 2012
                       IN WP/4029/2011

                    RAVAN VISHWANATH SHINDE
                                VERSUS
                     RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS
                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. N. B. Patil
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T.G. Gaikwad
                            ….
                              AND
                                 (2)
                                                         902 to 910.odt
               905 CONT. PETITION NO. 51 OF 2012
                       IN WP/4025/2011

                      RAVAN MAROTI KEKAN
                            VERSUS
                    RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS

                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. Uma S. Bhosale
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T.G. Gaikwad
                                  …..
                            AND
                906 CONT. PETITION NO. 52 OF 2012
                           IN WP/4026/2011

                   NARAYAN RAMRAO NEHARKAR
                                VERSUS
                     RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS
                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                 ….
                                  AND
                907 CONT. PETITION NO. 65 OF 2012
                           IN WP/4046/2011

                  DATTATRAYA SAMBHAJI CHAVAN
                                VERSUS
                     RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS
                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. G.A. Kulkarni
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                  …
                              AND
                908 CONT. PETITION NO. 67 OF 2012
                           IN WP/4028/2011

                   PRALHAD SAKHARAM LOMTE
                            VERSUS
                    RAJGOPAL DEORA AND ORS
                                 (3)
                                                         902 to 910.odt
                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. R. D. Raut
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                  …
                                 AND
                909 CONT. PETITION NO. 68 OF 2012
                           IN WP/4024/2011

                     SUBRAO FAKIRJI PANDE
                           VERSUS
                    RAJGOPA DEORA AND ORS

                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                  …
                                 AND
                910 CONT. PETITION NO. 81 OF 2012
                           IN WP/4031/2011

                 BALASAHEB BALIKRAM GAIKWAD
                           VERSUS
                    RAJGOPA DEORA AND ORS

                                  …..
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Sharad S. Shinde h/f
                             Mr. V. P. Bhavthankar
AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. J. Salgare
Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. T. G. Gaikwad
                                  …

                  CORAM :     SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, &
                              VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J.

                  DATED :      SEPTEMBER 03, 2026

ORDER (PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J):-

1.     Learned counsel Mr. Sharad S. Shinde holding for Mr. V. P.

Bhavthankar, advocate for the petitioners submits that, all these
                                 (4)
                                                         902 to 910.odt
contempt petitions have become infructutous, as the order under

contempt is complied with.



2.     In view of the same, all the contempt petitions stand disposed

of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)            (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
      JUDGE                                JUDGE

YSK/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…