Bombay High Court
Yashavantrao Chavan Shikshan Prasa Amit Rajendra PatilversusRanjit Singh Deol
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondents had complied with the contempt orders and therefore disposed of the petitions.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad bench) heard three separate contempt petitions (Nos. 518, 524 and 522 of 2026) filed by Yashavantrao Chavan Shikshan Prasa Amit and Rajendra Patil, Anshul Kapoor, and Gramin Unnati Mandal Erandol Gopi Gold English Medium School respectively, against Ranjit Singh Deol, Principal Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports. The petitioners, through counsel Ahutosh Sisodiya, contended that the respondents had complied with the earlier contempt orders. The Court examined the compliance submissions and found them satisfactory. Accordingly, the Court ordered that all three contempt petitions be disposed of. No further directions were issued.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondents have complied with the earlier contempt orders?
- Whether the contempt petitions should be dismissed?
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- petition disposal
- high court
Judgment
(1)
940, 943 & 946.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
940 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 518 OF 2026
IN WP/840/2026
YASHAVANTRAO CHAVAN SHIKSHAN PRASA AMIT
RAJENDRA PATIL
VERSUS
RANJIT SINGH DEOL
AND
943 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 524 OF 2026
IN WP/15235/2025
ANSHUL KAPOOR
VERSUS
RANJIT SINGH DEOL
AND
946 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 522 OF 2026
IN WP/15552/2025
GRAMIN UNNATI MANDAL ERANDOL GOPI GOLD ENGLISH
MEDIUM SCHOOL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT, SACHIN
RAMESH V
VERSUS
SHRI RANJIT SINGH DEOL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF
DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS
MANTRALAYA,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Ahutosh Sisodiya, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Shinde, Ms. M.N. Ghanekar and Ms. Uma Bhosale,
AGPs for respondent-State in respective petitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 1st October, 2026
(2)
940, 943 & 946.odt
Per Court :
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners in all these petitions
submits that order under contempt in these petitions is
complied with.
2. In view of the same, all these contempt petitions stand
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
VD_Dhirde
Checking your session…