Bombay High Court
NARAYAN GOVIND INJEWAD AND ANRversusMR. J.S. SAHARIA AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was disposed as the government had complied with the court's order under contempt.
Summary
In Contempt Petition No. 528 of 2012, the petitioners sought enforcement of a prior court order directing the government to grant approval to a proposal. The government, through an affidavit-in-reply, affirmed that it had taken the required decision as per the court's direction. The bench examined the affidavit and found that the order under contempt had been complied with. Consequently, the court held that there was no longer any ground for the contempt petition. The petition was therefore disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the government complied with the court's order directing approval, thereby satisfying the contempt petition.
Subjects
- contempt
- compliance
- court order
- petition disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43389-DB
1 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2012
NARAYAN GOVIND INJEWAD AND ANR
VERSUS
MR. J.S. SAHARIA AND ANR
...
None for the Petitioners
Adv. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 22/09/2026
Order (Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. )
. None for the petitioners.
2. The learned AGP points out the affidavit-in-reply filed by
respondent No. 2, wherein it is stated that the Government has
taken decision on the proposal of the petitioner for granting
approval, as directed by this Court in the order under contempt.
3. In view of compliance of the order under contempt, nothing
survives in the contempt petition and the same stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…